Evidence-based practice incorporates scientific evidence, client perspectives, and clinical expertise. Image from asha.org
Book: Dang, D., Dearholt, S., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and Guidelines (Fourth). Sigma Theta Tau International.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
The Cochrane Handbook details how Cochrane reviews are conducted. This includes definitions for various risks of bias and standards for conducting meta-analyses.
PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) focuses on the reporting of systematic reviews but also includes protocol information.
The highest-quality clinical practice guidelines are based on the strongest evidence, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Pyramid of evidence image from Baystate Health Libraries, CC BY-SA 4.0.
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence
Chart adapted from Grove, S. K., Burns, N., Gray, J. (2013). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier/Saunders.
Level 1 (Highest Quality) |
Systematic review of experimental studies (well-designed randomized control trials) and meta-analyses |
Level 2 |
Meta-analysis of experimental (RCT) and quasi-experimental studies |
Level 3 |
Integrative reviews of experimental (RCT) and quasi-experimental |
Level 4 |
Single experimental study (RCT) |
Level 5 |
Single quasi-experimental study |
Level 6 |
Meta-analysis of correlational studies |
Level 7 |
Integrative reviews of correlational and descriptive studies |
Level 8 |
Mixed methods systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies |
Level 9 |
Meta-synthesis of qualitative research |
Level 10 |
Single correlational study |
Level 11 |
Single qualitative or descriptive study |
Level 12 |
Opinions of respected authorities based upon clinical evidence, reports of expert committees |